Monday, June 2, 2008

Lee sparks Australian surge

West Indies v Australia, 2nd Test, Antigua, 4th day

Lee sparks Australian surge

June 2, 2008

Australia 479 for 7 dec and 244 for 6 (Jaques 76) lead West Indies 352 (Chanderpaul 107*, Sarwan 65, Marshall 53, Lee 5-59) by 371 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball commentary
How they were out




Brett Lee bowled a superb spell to remove five West Indies batsmen © AFP

Brett Lee breathed life into a meandering match with a masterful spell of fast reverse-swing that overshadowed Shivnarine Chanderpaul's second century of the series and significantly increased the chances of a final-day result. Lee's strikes ensured Australia's first-innings lead of 127 and by the end of the fourth day Phil Jaques had run with the momentum, posting 76 and setting up the visitors' advantage of 371.

At the close Australia had reached 244 for 6, with Andrew Symonds unbeaten on 43 after Lee fell from the last ball of the day. Their lead appeared to be more than adequate to secure the Frank Worrell Trophy - they only need a draw - but there was no indication as to when Ricky Ponting would give his bowlers a chance to push for the victory.

Despite their deteriorating position, West Indies refused to be dictated to, and gradually picked off Australia's batsmen. Jerome Taylor grabbed a couple of wickets, trapping Ponting lbw for 38 and drawing an edge behind from Jaques, while a sharp throw from Chanderpaul ended Michael Clarke's stay on 10. But Australia had such a lead that they were not under any real match pressure, although there was some physical pain when Lee took a nasty blow to the helmet from a cracking Fidel Edwards bouncer.

Jaques battled through a scratchy opening and started to find some form, compiling his first half-century in a Test without Matthew Hayden by his side. He put on a 74-run opening stand with Michael Hussey, who was sent out first as Simon Katich was still nursing a bruised rib sustained during his first-innings century. Hussey looked confident while driving his way to 40.

While Jaques and the rest of the top order improved Australia's buffer with relative ease, it was Lee who gave them the opportunity. On a pitch that appeared deader than Stuart MacGill's Test career, Lee located the defibrillators that no other fast bowler could find. He shocked West Indies' middle order into an early exit following a productive 132-run partnership between Dwayne Bravo and Chanderpaul - whose consistency continues to astound - and grabbed five wickets thanks to his venomous late swing.

Lee did benefit from some poor umpiring decisions but he worked hard for the results in a vicious six-over display. The spell, which was broken up by a one-over break to change his shoes, earned Lee 5 for 11, including three wickets in four balls as the lower order battled to deal with his bending of the ball. The major blow came when Bravo, who had compiled a proper Test innings of 45 by controlling his aggressive urges, was adjudged to have feathered a catch down leg side to Brad Haddin. Bravo was clearly disappointed and the replays were inconclusive - it may have come off his thigh pad - but Denesh Ramdin certainly suffered from an umpiring lapse next ball.

Ramdin's eyes had hardly adjusted to the sunshine when he received a startling inswinging yorker from Lee. He jammed the bat down too late and was given lbw by Russell Tiffin, although the ball had struck him outside the line of off stump. Darren Sammy survived the hat-trick delivery but with Lee's next effort became another victim of the reverse swing and Tiffin's misjudgement. Like Ramdin, Sammy was hit outside the line trying to defend and was sent on his way regardless.

West Indies got the worst of the decisions but Lee created the opportunities by sending down hand-grenades. He varied his attack by pushing Taylor back with fast stuff before bowling him with a slower ball, and swung another in to Daren Powell, who was correctly judged lbw to give Lee figures of 5 for 59. Mitchell Johnson ended the innings at 352 when he had Edwards caught behind and it was a relief for Johnson, who was partly responsible for allowing Chanderpaul and Bravo to build such a strong partnership earlier in the day.

Strangely, Ponting opened the morning with his two weaker bowlers and Johnson sprayed deliveries alternately wide of leg and off stumps as he failed to find the late swing that Lee mastered. MacGill was also having problems with his line and length and allowed Bravo to release his aggression with a couple of full tosses that disappeared over midwicket. Chanderpaul, who was largely content to score through well-guided late cuts and nudges, also put MacGill away on his way to an unbeaten 107. When Ponting turned to his part-timers to race through some overs - perhaps wary that he had lost half his match fee in Kingston for slow over rates - Chanderpaul brought up his hundred with an uncharacteristic slog sweep over midwicket off Symonds.

It continued Chanderpaul's remarkable year - in the past 12 months he has made five Test centuries and averages 98.50. He survived the Lee onslaught but as his partners rapidly departed, it became increasingly unlikely that Chanderpaul could carry the hopes of an archipelago on his tiny shoulders as officials began polishing up the Frank Worrell Trophy in anticipation of a possible presentation to Ponting on Tuesday.

Quote Unquote: IPL edition

June 2, 2008




Who's the best human being in this picture? © AFP

"I'm getting a little too old for so many close finishes."
Shane Warne on Rajasthan Royals' final-ball win over the Chennai Super Kings in the IPL final

"I think I will donate the money to Mother Teresa or something like that."
Shoaib Akhtar explains what he will do with the proceeds after auctioning his Kolkata Knight Riders helmet

"My team told me that they have yet to meet a better human being than me. This is a huge compliment."
Kolkata franchise owner Shah Rukh Khan doesn't have time for false modesty

"Had I been 21, I would easily have cracked this."
Rahul Dravid, 35, wishes Twenty20 had existed earlier

"I am as dedicated to my Knights as I am to my kids."
Shah Rukh Khan plays dad to his side

"I want to thank the crowd for their support. It was pretty one-sided for Mumbai. Just don't forget some of the Punjab boys also play for India."
Yuvraj Singh, the captain of the Kings XI Punjab, isn't pleased with the Wankhede crowd's behaviour

"I hope the national selectors were watching."
Sourav Ganguly responds to Ramiz Raja's suggestion that he was like an energetic schoolboy in the field during the Kolkata Knight Riders' stirring defence of a low total against the Delhi Daredevils

"The IPL has taken the game to virtually every house in the world."
Sachin Tendulkar holds forth on globalisation

"Once Shoaib sees the crowds, and of course the babes around, I think he will be able to perform."
Wasim Akram has a dig at Shoaib Akhtar

"This is not cricket. This is the greatest divide between the rich and the poor. With that kind of money, you could have built another cement factory."
Jaswant Singh, leader of the opposition, criticises the IPL in the upper house of the Indian parliament

"It must seem like volunteer work to those who have drunk from the IPL's ruby-encrusted goblet."
Journalist Peter Lalor on what it will be like for the IPL set to return to international cricket

"Violence between players? Scantily clad cheerleaders? Toss in a rant by Charles Barkley and three minutes of commercials for every 45 seconds of actual game time and cricket may finally be ready for a mainstream American audience."
The Los Angeles Times warms to the idea of Twenty20 cricket




What can I do with all my IPL riches? © Getty Images

"The phrase 'he had it coming' has rarely been so close to everyone's lips."
A lack of sympathy for Sreesanth from journalist Lawrence Booth

"He is [the] Moses of the game who has shown the path to blazing success."
Ravi Shastri decides it's time to praise IPL commissioner Lalit Modi. Presumably he was referring to Edwin, the hurdler

"The last time there were issues of this nature, Mr Greig gave up playing for England, probably because he thought he could get back in easily, and then Ian Botham appeared."
ECB chief Giles Clarke expresses his view that no England player would risk his place for a quick payday in the IPL. The fact that Greig and Botham played together in the 1977 Ashes is, presumably, neither here nor there

"We are trying to dehumanise the opposition as much as possible so that we can concentrate on what we can do and try to knock off as many colours as possible! We are not too much into reputation."
Martin Crowe on the Bangalore Royal Challengers' strategy for the next game; India might have just found their next Greg Chappell

"I've probably bowled the worst last over in Twenty20 history. Twenty20 is good for the game but not for the ego."
Andrew Symonds reveals it was not just his bowling that took a beating in the game against the Rajasthan Royals

"I'm going to tell all my producers to not release any movie between April 19 and May 30. It will be suicide."
Preity Zinta, Bollywood actress and joint-owner of the Kings XI Punjab franchise, is convinced the IPL is going to be a big success

"It's really unusual to come to Bombay, hit a four and see nobody clapping for you."
Rahul Dravid jokes about his experience in Bangalore's match in Mumbai in the Indian Premier League

"I fear the day is approaching when a high-profile, televised cricket match will see an outbreak of physical violence on the field."
Scyld Berry, editor of Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 2008 is ominously prescient weeks ahead of Slapgate

"I never lasted more than 20 overs. Did I?"
Kris Srikkanth tries to justify why he's the perfect brand ambassador for the Chennai Super Kings

"It's like three-minute Maggi noodles. Bang, bang, and it is over. For me, it is not cricket."
Arjuna Ranatunga isn't too impressed with the IPL




Let me lead you to the promised land © AFP

"In terms of sporting endeavour and prestige, the IPL is to cricket what diarrhoea is to dodgy curry houses - an unfortunate byproduct."
Paul Lewis, in the New Zealand Herald, clearly doesn't care much about developments in India

"There was a little element of feeling like a cow."
Getting auctioned for US$700,000 got Adam Gilchrist in touch with his bovine side

"The expenses involved are huge, and I am not doing the figures. I will see what it is like at the end of the year and then, depending on the balance sheet, I will have to dance at a few more marriages."
Shahrukh Khan is ready to go the distance to make his IPL franchise, the Kolkata Knight Riders, a success

"John's last visit to Kolkata was not very memorable. But we assure you this time you'll leave with happy memories."
Sourav Ganguly, the captain of Kolkata Knight Riders, tries to exorcise any demons John Buchanan, the coach, might be carrying from the Test in 2000-01, which Australia famously lost to Ganguly's Indians. Buchanan was Australia's coach then

"I could end up being the bargain buy of the tournament, you never know."
A smiling Ricky Ponting brushes off his comparatively low IPL price tag

"He actually sent me a text message this morning and said, 'I can't believe you're worth double what I am'."
David Hussey got one-up on brother Michael in the IPL players' auction

Next steps for IPL





Shane Watson was IPL's Player of the Tournament © Getty Images
With 472 runs and 17 wickets for the Rajasthan Royals, Shane Watson won the Player of the Tournament award, beating Shaun Marsh and Shane Warne to the US$23,500 prize. Hindustan Times' Varun Gupta catches up with him and finds out how Watson has struggled through several injuries to get where he is.
"The last couple of years were hellish as I missed the Ashes, and it's been a pretty long process since then. But I have been lucky to have one person, my guiding light, who has simply been amazing. Popov [sports physiotherapist] did quite a few different things with my body, he shook it up. And the guidance, time and the knowledge he has given me have been vital in me being where I am now."

In the same paper Anand Vasu writes that IPL will change the way the game is governed and consumed around the world.

The IPL has been a wild success, according to Rahul Bhattacharya, but such success can be disquieting, he adds. The cricket is a bit like video-game cricket, he writes in the Guardian.

The best games had a kind of compressed intensity where each delivery held the weight of an entire match... A six in the IPL, every 622 of them, was no longer a six, it was a 'DLF Maximum.' A sharp catch came branded as a 'Citi Moment Of Success'. Commentators tripped over each other to make these plugs. A future where a batsman executes a Toyota Front-Foot Drive against an Intel Faster One may not be the stuff of satire.

In the same paper, Randeep Ramesh ponders whether the IPL is a sign of a nation breaking free of a colonial legacy or just a crass money-making machine.

Cricket historian Boria Majumdar is convinced the IPL has been a resounding success. In the Times of India he lists out what the franchises have planned over the next year:

There’s talk of some franchise owners speaking to Australian state sides like Victoria to organise home and away games during the IPL off-season. If such plans are successful, we might soon see Rajasthan or Punjab taking on Victoria or New South Wales in attempts to keep the brands alive. Shah Rukh’s opening of an exclusive store in Kolkata to sell Knight Riders apparel is another such attempt. If industry estimates are to be believed, Knight Riders merchandise worth more than Rs 5 crore have already been sold from the Kolkata store since its opening on May 12.




Shikhar Dhawan - a domestic success in the IPL © Getty Images
The editors at Indian Express feel the IPL has revealed talented domestic players and India, who just a year ago had a shock exit from the World Cup at the league stage, have been shown to possess a bench strength no one could have suspected before last month.
It should not have taken the IPL to reveal this. And the next step in nurturing this talent after the conclusion of Lalit Modi’s extravaganza need not necessarily be the squeezing in of a bi-annual Twenty20 competition. The capacity of Yusuf Pathan and Shikhar Dhawan, to name just two of IPL’s biggest stars, to hold their own against the best must focus the BCCI on making the domestic circuit more competitive and marketable. Those who play for the country must be made more involved with domestic cricket.

Meanwhile, over in the Telegraph, Nick Hoult reveals some of the franchises' ambitious plans to extend their interest beyond cricket.


If a match against a top (English Premier League football) side gets off the ground, the (Deccan) Chargers will look into creating their own football team, comprising recently retired players. The prospect of a team of travelling all-stars, made up of the likes of Zinedine Zidane and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, is being explored.

The IPL and the art of captaincy

Different strokes

June 2, 2008



Warne led spectacularly, but also contributed with ball and bat © Getty Images

The irony was striking. The IPL was supposed to symbolise cricket's future, but the winning captain openly sniggered at laptops. Twenty20 was supposed to be an instinctive form that didn't offer much time for thought, but the finalists were led by the two most charismatic leaders.

"If you walk up to a bowler and look worried, it gets to him," said Mahendra Singh Dhoni after the second semi-final. "So I act as if I'm not." At once it conjured up images of Rahul Dravid and Sachin Tendulkar - anxious, nervous and hoping for the bowler to hold his nerve while appearing to be losing theirs. There was Yuvraj Singh, who seemed to holler louder as the tension increased, and Harbhajan Singh made a habit of chewing his fingernails.

Dravid made an interesting point after the daylight robbery Bangalore pulled off in Chennai, when an inexplicable collapse helped his side to a win against the odds. When asked about how well he had led, Dravid blushed. "When you win, every captain looks good. When you lose, whatever you do appears wrong."

Admittedly a lot of analysis of captaincy relies on hindsight, but the IPL made one thing clear: the shrewdest survived. Kolkata's John Buchanan wanted his side to approach every game as if they were confronting 240 individual battles, one for each ball. The depth of the planning was evident. Added to that was a demand for quickly adapting to the conditions and changing plans accordingly.

Shane Warne imposed himself. While hailing his leadership skills nobody should forget the value he offered as a player - no other captain played as many match-winning hands. More than one Rajasthan player has spoken of the boost the side received after Warne's sensational finish against Deccan Chargers, when he carted Andrew Symonds for 17 off the final over. One team-mate has said how his faith in the captain increased ten-fold that evening. Warne was in the middle in the final too and the crack through covers in the penultimate over, when 12 were needed off 7, set up the finish.

Rattling the Bangalore top order with a bouncer barrage on a lively Chinnaswamy pitch was a classic case of astute planning coming off. The sight of Warne alerting the fielders at fine leg to anticipate a catch will stick in the mind. So also, Warne giving his faster bowlers one-over spells against Chennai, in the second match between the sides, was another one of those little surprises that had a big impact.

Warne was also blessed with that enviable quality good captains usually need - luck. He won 10 of his 15 tosses, and even when some of his gambles misfired - like the promotion of Sohail Tanvir up the order - it didn't cost them too much. The punt on Swapnil Asnodkar came off spectacularly. And whenever a match went down to the wire, Rajasthan found that extra bit of magic to pull it off.

Dhoni was the other captain team-mates swore by. His batting made a difference in a few games but it was his ice-cool demeanour that stood out. His side were unstoppable at full-strength, but even after their Australians left, Chennai continued to upset strong teams in close finishes. The decision to hold back L Balaji for the final overs in the second game against Punjab proved a masterstroke, and the faith he placed in Joginder Sharma to bowl the last over in Chennai's first few games never backfired. Maybe he missed Joginder in the final over of the final too.




Mumbai's three captains came with contrasting styles: Harbhajan impulsive, Pollock measured, Tendulkar fidgety




One wonders how things would have panned out if Dhoni had kept wicket in the second half of the tournament - he has admitted he leads better when he keeps, standing in a position where one can read the game best. He also might just have been more efficient than Parthiv Patel behind the stumps, especially when it came to batsmen taking off for byes to the keeper.

Yuvraj never really inspired with the bat but was fortunate to have Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene by his side - two allies he regularly turned to. Where Yuvraj did inspire, though, was in the field - he was at the centre of the cliffhanger in Mumbai, lambasting his fielders for every minor lapse. He bowled a tight over and clinched the win with a diving run-out straight out of the Jonty Rhodes album.

The decision to give James Hopes the final over against Delhi - in the rain-curtailed game - was a brave one, and one that made the eventual difference. And the continued faith Yuvraj reposed in VRV Singh was as surprising as it proved effective. Yuvraj was also fortunate to have the most balanced side in the tournament - one where overseas batsmen and Indian bowlers went about their jobs efficiently. Rarely did Shaun Marsh let them down, and the rest of the order always had a launch pad in place.

Early in the tournament Virender Sehwag appeared to have netted the best side among the eight. He had a new-ball pairing to die for and a top three that fired in every match; Sehwag could really run the ship on auto-pilot. But things started getting tough when Plan A didn't fall into place.

His move to bowl Amit Mishra in the final over against Deccan was inspired, and produced a hat-trick. While a smile was never too far from his face, even when the rest were suffering palpitations, Sehwag might look back on a couple of key moments - giving Shoaib Malik the final over against Chennai and bowling himself, instead of Glenn McGrath, in the crunch against Punjab. Both games slipped away and the road to the semi-finals got rougher.

The excessive faith placed in Malik was intriguing, especially when there was Tillakaratne Dilshan waiting in the wings. Sehwag could possibly have rejigged the batting order once it was clear that the middle four weren't striking the high notes.

Mumbai's three captains came with contrasting styles: Harbhajan Singh impulsive, Shaun Pollock measured, and Tendulkar fidgety. In a team with a number of unheralded players, Pollock and Tendulkar were figures to look up to. Abhishek Nayar and Rohan Raje spoke about how eager they were to pay back the faith that a legend like Tendulkar had placed in them.



Dravid fought the good fight but struggled to come to grips with the demands of the format through the tournament © Getty Images

Close finishes, though, were a bugbear for Mumbai. While Harbhajan entrusted bowlers who appeared off-colour - his confidence in Ashish Nehra proved costly against Bangalore - Tendulkar occasionally also under-used those who appeared on song: he left Pollock with one over to bowl against Punjab and not bowling Nehra in the final over against Rajasthan. "We didn't show enough common sense" was how Tendulkar summarised the last-ball defeat to Rajasthan. The same could have been attributed to several other close misses.

How Sourav Ganguly would wish he had found some form early in the tournament, especially after he inspired Kolkata to two wins late in the piece. Ganguly the captain is usually at his best when his batting clicks. He turned it on when he could with the ball, notably in his spell to thwart Bangalore.

What Ganguly might regret, though, is not getting his combination right for most of the tournament. Chris Gayle's injury was a big blow, especially after Ricky Ponting and Brendon McCullum left, but the amount of confidence reposed in Mohammad Hafeez was slightly baffling. Ajit Agarkar started well but didn't deserve the long rope he got. It was probably in their very last game that Kolkata got their right combination. By then it was just a bit too late.

Dravid, surprisingly, finished among the top 12 run-getters but it was never going to be enough with a faltering team. He did try and put up a brave fight and ended the campaign with a few smiles, but these were just a few positives from a forgettable campaign.

He may introspect on how Bangalore won just one game among the five where he won the toss. He said they were trying to come to grips with the nuances of the format and didn't really have a preferred option at the toss. The selections of a few XIs were puzzling, and they also made a habit of choking when the target was in sight.

Neither VVS Laxman nor Adam Gilchrist will look back on the IPL too fondly. Both watched one close loss after another and by the end one could almost see them coming. Laxman veered from too conservative to too experimental - against Punjab at home no bowler got to bowl two overs in a row - but struggled to strike a balance. Things might have turned around had Warne not smashed Symonds for 17, but when it came to close finishes Deccan were always second best.

Gilchrist couldn't really express himself, with the knowledge hanging over him that a collapse was likely just round the corner. The rest of their overseas players sleepwalked through the series and it was left to Rohit Sharma and Venugopal Rao to earn a few consolation prizes.

Dot balls, boundaries, and the luckiest captain

IPL stats review

Dot balls, boundaries, and the luckiest captain

June 2, 2008

Cricinfo looks back at some of the important stats from the 45-day IPL tournament.




Shane Warne: winning matches, winning tosses © Getty Images

The toss factor
Most captains struggled to make the right decision through the early part of the tournament, but in the end, 28 out of 58 games were won by the team calling correctly at the toss - through the first 17 games, only five were won by the side winning the toss, a percentage of just 29.40. In the last 41 games, the percentage almost doubled to 56.10. This was largely because of the fact that most captains realised that chasing a target was the better option, with teams often unsure of what a competitive target could be when batting first.

Through the first 24 games, 14 times the captain winning the toss decided to bat. In the next 34 matches, only 12 times did they bat first. That was clearly the right way to go about it, for 36 out of 58 matches were won by the team batting second.

Rajasthan Royals were the luckiest team with the toss, winning it 11 times in 16 games. They made good use of it too, winning nine of those 11 matches, and didn't do badly when the coin didn't fall their way either, winning four out of five. Deccan Chargers, on the other hand, frittered away the toss advantage - they called correctly nine times, but only won two of those games.

Mahendra Singh Dhoni was the unluckiest captain, winning just five tosses out of 16. Rahul Dravid was almost as bad, with five from 14 games, while Virender Sehwag managed six out of 15. Bangalore Royal Challengers, though, were the worst in utilising the toss advantage, winning one of those five games.

Teams and tosses
Team Tosses won Toss & match won Percentage
Rajasthan Royals 11 9 81.82
Chennai Super Kings 5 3 60
Kings XI Punjab 8 4 50
Mumbai Indians 8 4 50
Kolkata Knight Riders 6 3 50
Delhi Daredevils 6 2 33.33
Deccan Chargers 9 2 22.22
Bangalore Royal Challengers 5 1 20

How the runs were scored and conceded
Deccan managed the highest percentage of runs in boundaries, but they played a fairly high number of dots. Their running between the wickets wasn't great either, with just 73 twos, 47 fewer than Rajasthan, who relied more on singles, twos and threes than on finding the boundaries.

How the teams scored their runs
Teams Dots 1s, 2s, 3s 4s 6s Dot % Boundary %
(as factor of total runs)
Delhi Daredevils 584 691 218 54 39.06 56.60
Kings XI Punjab 691 721 231 95 41.18 60.63
Rajasthan Royals 767 750 258 85 42.99 59.28
Deccan Chargers 715 654 205 92 44.33 61.55
Chennai Super Kings 796 748 244 86 44.49 59.23
Bangalore Royal Challengers 723 690 187 59 45.16 55.57
Kolkata Knight Riders 715 603 162 75 47.83 56.54
Mumbai Indians 745 564 197 76 49.83 59.81

Rajasthan also bowled plenty of dot balls - their percentage of 45.81 was next only to Kolkata's 48.83. Deccan were the worst in terms of applying pressure on the batsmen - their dot-ball percentage was only 41.59, the least among all teams.

How the teams conceded their runs
Teams Dots 1s, 2s, 3s 4s 6s Dot % Boundary %
(as factor of total runs)
Kolkata Knight Riders 625 500 176 48 48.83 57.74
Rajasthan Royals 837 757 218 86 45.81 57.76
Mumbai Indians 700 656 204 66 44.84 57.82
Kings XI Punjab 760 689 227 93 44.76 60.65
Bangalore Royal Challengers 687 641 219 75 43.79 60.16
Delhi Daredevils 690 678 204 86 43.15 59.92
Chennai Super Kings 777 809 233 88 42.48 56.85
Deccan Chargers 660 691 221 80 41.59 59.25

Powerplays, slog overs, and more
Rajasthan's strength was their ability to outperform their opponents through the middle and final stages of the innings. During the Powerplays, Mumbai Indians were the best side, losing just 18 wickets and taking 26. Their average runs scored and scoring rate were both higher than what they conceded, while Kings XI Punjab were pretty impressive as well. At the other end of the spectrum were Bangalore, who were woeful with both bat and ball during the Powerplays - they averaged 18.82 per wicket when batting, and conceded 55.08 per dismissal when bowling. Clearly, their performance when facing and using the new ball needs huge improvement next season.

Teams in the Powerplays
Team Bat Ave Bat SR Bowl ave Bowl SR Ave diff SR diff
Mumbai Indians 38.11 8.21 22.92 7.09 15.19 1.12
Kings XI Punjab 40.73 8.60 25.07 7.80 15.66 0.80
Rajasthan Royals 35.80 7.83 31.04 7.43 4.76 0.40
Delhi Daredevils 33.90 8.47 34.65 8.25 -0.75 0.22
Deccan Chargers 33.26 7.52 36.33 7.78 -3.07 -0.26
Chennai Super Kings 36.10 7.52 33.43 8.01 2.67 -0.49
Kolkata Knight Riders 18.41 6.84 21.88 7.34 -3.47 -0.50
Bangalore Royal Challengers 18.82 6.50 55.08 7.86 -36.26 -1.36

In the middle overs, though, Rajasthan and Delhi Daredevils were the leading teams. Rajasthan scored at 8.7 runs per over during this passage, and only conceded 7.42 per over. Delhi are close behind, while Chennai Super Kings' high batting average is offset by an even higher bowling average. Bangalore continue to languish at the bottom.

Teams in the middle overs (7 to 14)
Team Bat Ave Bat SR Bowl ave Bowl SR Ave diff SR diff
Rajasthan Royals 32.76 8.70 24.97 7.42 7.79 1.28
Delhi Daredevils 35.76 8.27 26.74 7.82 9.02 0.45
Kings XI Punjab 33.78 8.31 31.63 8.11 2.15 0.20
Chennai Super Kings 41.83 8.22 43.00 8.07 -1.17 0.15
Mumbai Indians 29.92 7.78 26.12 7.82 3.80 -0.04
Deccan Chargers 32.46 7.66 39.90 7.90 -7.44 -0.24
Kolkata Knight Riders 27.27 6.66 29.95 7.65 -2.23 -0.99
Bangalore Royal Challengers 22.74 7.10 39.60 8.13 -16.86 -1.03

During the last six overs, Rajasthan were clearly head and shoulders above the rest. Their ability to take wickets was most impressive - they took 48 during this period, the highest among the eight teams. Chennai and Delhi were among the wickets too, while Bangalore managed to lift themselves from last place, which went to Deccan - they lost 48 wickets during the last six overs.

Teams in the last six overs
Team Bat Ave Bat SR Bowl ave Bowl SR Ave diff SR diff
Rajasthan Royals 22.27 10.02 15.41 9.17 6.86 0.85
Kolkata Knight Riders 21.02 10.64 21.90 10.03 -0.88 0.61
Chennai Super Kings 22.65 9.89 16.67 9.46 5.98 0.43
Mumbai Indians 17.23 9.47 18.22 9.66 -0.99 -0.19
Kings XI Punjab 23.25 9.81 20.70 10.07 2.55 -0.26
Delhi Daredevils 16.35 8.86 15.57 9.16 0.78 -0.30
Bangalore Royal Challengers 15.26 9.04 21.06 9.64 -5.80 -0.60
Deccan Chargers 15.68 10.08 28.51 11.07 -12.83 -0.99

The opening gambit
As you'd expect in a 20-over contest, a good start was crucial to the fortunes of most teams. The sides that won games averaged 42 for the opening partnership, while the losing sides managed just 23.

Opening stands in the IPL

Runs Average stand Runs per over
Winning teams 2352 42.00 8.65
Losing teams 1343 23.16 7.18

Though Graeme Smith missed the final, he had a huge role to play in Rajasthan's success. His opening combination with Swapnil Asnodkar was the most successful of the tournament, in terms of runs per partnership (among pairs with at least five partnerships). Mumbai's heavyweight pair of Sanath Jayasuriya and Sachin Tendulkar had a rollicking time too - thanks largely to Jayasuriya's stunning form - while Delhi's pair of Gautam Gambhir and Virender Sehwag aggregated the most number of runs for the first wicket.

The three stand-out opening pairs in the IPL
Pair Innings Runs Average Runs per over 50/ 100 p'ships
Smith-Asnodkar 7 418 59.71 8.96 2/ 2
Jayasuriya-Tendulkar 7 400 57.14 9.23 4/ 0
Gambhir-Sehwag 14 529 37.79 9.80 3/ 1

Pace or spin?
The fast bowlers and the slow ones both had plenty to celebrate over the last 45 days. If Sohail Tanvir, Sreesanth, and Farveez Maharoof were some of the stars for the seam bowlers, then Shane Warne, Amit Mishra and Piyush Chawla kept the spinners' flag flying high. As the table shows below, there was little to separate the spinners from the fast bowlers.

Pace and spin in the IPL

Wickets Average Economy rate
Pace 470 28.54 8.07
Spin 134 30.38 8.19

The death of the ODI?

The success of the IPL has made it clear that something has to give to accommodate it, and on the current evidence that something will be the 50-over game

June 2, 2008




Glam quotient: the IPL brains trust threw in a dash - or dollops - of Bollywood flavour to spice up the IPL © AFP

When you consider how much the Indian Premier League borrowed from World Series Cricket, it¹s quite ironic that its success might lead to the eventual extinction of the pajama cricket that was the cornerstone of the Packer revolution. As much as World Series cricket was about fair pay, improved TV coverage and superior marketing of the sport, it was also about establishing one-day cricket as a distinct entity, played in coloured clothes, under lights, and in front of crowds that came expecting to be entertained.

It was razzmatazz with some substance. Packer¹s focus was on gladiatorial fast bowlers, and the strokeplayers that could take them on. Three decades later, the IPL advertised its players as warriors. When Andy Roberts fractured David Hookes¹ jaw with a vicious bouncer, people knew that the World Series wasn¹t some hit-and-giggle enterprise. The IPL had a similar moment, when Zaheer Khan left Dominic Thornely looking like a young Mike Tyson had seen to him. Packer was a pioneer and an original, and the IPL¹s copycats succeeded because they took his blueprint, adapted it to an Indian context, and threw in a dash of Bollywood for good measure.

This year, after an uninterrupted run of 28 years, Cricket Australia pulled the curtain down on the annual tri-series. It¹s fair to say that its decline had mirrored that of the one-day game. After the spectacular success of the ICC World Twenty20 in South Africa, and the inaugural IPL season, the one-day game is on life-support, and it may only be a matter of time before the plug is pulled. Crowds and television audiences caught in the thrall of the Twenty20 game are unlikely to shed a tear.

It¹s amusing to hear greats of the past talking of how the IPL¹s success could have dire consequences for Test cricket. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Test-cricket constituency is a distinct one, and it generally consists of people who have played the game at some level, whether that¹s back garden, park, first-class or international. More importantly, it¹s a group of people that appreciate what Milan Kundera called Slowness, those not obsessed with instant gratification.

Such fans will never abandon Test cricket for the crash-bang-wallop thrills that Twenty20 offers. He or she may go and watch Dumb and Dumber, but it¹s never going to replace 400 Blows or In the Mood for Love in his affections.

Sadly, one-day cricket has no identity. In that respect, its like your stereotypical Bollywood movie with the hackneyed script that tries to have something for everyone, and ends up having nothing. It says much about the lack of imagination of those that administer the game that the 50-over game has evolved so little since the Packer years.

Compare that with Lalit Modi. You may not like the man or his hubris, but he has taken an existing concept, fine-tuned it, and ensured that the cricket world will never be the same again. After Sunday night¹s final, which could have been scripted by Gregory Howard of Remember the Titans fame, Modi and the IPL hold all the cards, while the ICC and other boards have next to nothing to bargain with.

The last World Cup in the Caribbean was a fiasco, an object lesson in how not to organise an event. Poor crowds, overpriced tickets, a lack of atmosphere and an interminable schedule all combined to make it perhaps the worst of all major competitions. In contrast, the IPL¹s head honchos didn¹t behave like stentorian schoolmasters, and the entertainment package that accompanied the games attracted everyone from five-year-olds with temporary tattoos to middle-aged women who had decided to forego a staple diet of TV soaps.

Where now for the IPL? After what happened on Sunday night, there¹s little doubt that the second season will be huge. Despite the concerns of the ECB and others, every single one of the world¹s top players is likely to take part. If they do try to prevent the likes of Kevin Pietersen from playing, they¹ll only end up being checkmated like the Australian Cricket Board were after Packer¹s bold gambit.

What is likely to happen is this: Both England and Australia, and perhaps South Africa and Pakistan too, will endeavour to jazz up their own T20 events so that they can at least compare to the IPL. A Champions League will surely result from it, because the stupendous response in India has confirmed that people are ready to invest both time and money to watch the best play the best, even if it's only over three hours.

The franchises, none of whom are likely to be too perturbed by the huge amounts invested in the first year, also have a role to play. Manoj Badale, of the Emerging Media group that owns the Rajasthan Royals, reckoned that it would take a couple of years for the club culture to truly take root, but you can rest assured that teams like Rajasthan won¹t be spending the next 10 months idle.

The reality is that no league can prosper if it operates only over six weeks. American Football has the shortest season of any major sport, but even that lasts 16 weeks, and then a month of play-offs. The football [soccer] seasons in Europe, the NBA in North America and Major League Baseball all last much longer, which is why they become such an integral part of fans¹ lives.

What does the Indian cricket fan do now? Next up is a tri-series in Bangladesh, followed by an Asia Cup that features teams like Hong Kong. It¹s the classic champagne-followed-by-flat-beer scenario, and it will be interesting to see what the TV ratings are like. Back when Doordarshan, the national broadcaster was all we had, everyone watched it. Then, with the onset of cable TV, no one bothered.




Where now for the IPL? After what happened on Sunday night, there's little doubt that the second season will be huge. Despite the concerns of the ECB and others, every single one of the world's top players is likely to take part. If they do try to prevent the likes of Kevin Pietersen from playing, they'll only end up being checkmated like the Australian Cricket Board was after Packer's bold gambit




The IPL has created a revolution, especially in the fan demographic, but has now left town. For the moment, the talk is of creating a four-week window, most likely in April. It¹s only a band-aid solution. In the long run, we¹re looking at a three-month season where teams play weekend games and the occasional midweek one as they do in the major football leagues. Those will alternate with Champions League games featuring the top sides.

A six or eight-month period might be set aside for Test cricket and other bilateral contests, but the fact is that cricket needs a 50-overs-a-side game between India and Hong Kong like it needs a hole in the head. After watching McGrath against Jayasuriya and Warne against Ganguly, why would anyone settle for such mediocrity? Unless one-day cricket can reinvent itself, and four innings of 20 overs each is the best suggestion I¹ve heard, it has one foot in the grave, with the fact that the World Cup is the jewel in the ICC crown being the only thing keeping it alive.

It¹s an opinion that even players share. Stephen Fleming was New Zealand¹s finest captain, the one who led them to their only major one-day triumph, the ICC Knockout in 2000. ³I am worried about the amount of one-day cricket, how much appeal one-day cricket is going to have with tournaments like this,² he said. ³I think the majority feels that it could cause a problem for the international calendar.²

The response to the first season of World Series Cricket, with the forces of orthodoxy ranged against it, was so lukewarm that a desperate Packer was reduced to counting the cars in the parking lot. No one saw Modi doing anything similar, and the perfectly scripted final has guaranteed that all the franchises will be counting next year are even bigger gate receipts. As for one-day cricket, the message has been bellowed out through a foghorn. Transform or perish.

IPL is Over now: Mukesh Jha

As I am also a very Big Cricket Lover...But I found some Good & bad drawbacks of IPL which found more popularity in very short time as little as in 6 weeks.According to duration of the game , Its absolutely perfect game to watch But In the other hand I can say this is not the type of cricket, Anyone can be the best player or worst player within few hours then look at the performance of Sachin,Dravid,Lara,Ponting,Ganguly ..Anyway everyone has their own thought against anything ....But I think its very bad for 50 overs game & test matches. I don't think anyone will like to watch the test game or even the 50 overs ODI from now on....
Relationship between Bollywood stars & players now has been very close but this is also not in the favor of good cricket.game can not be a business of millionaires...

Anyway it was fun to watch!!!