Sunday, April 27, 2008

Twenty20

If Twenty20 is to be more than a fad, it needs to evolve and become more multi-dimensional, and balance the entertainment and the cricket better




Cheerleaders are all very well, but when a format is as predictable as Twenty20 often is, they become the main event © Getty Images

Before assessing the achievements of IPL while still in its infancy, I should first declare my interests. If I want to watch dancing girls, I go to the Moulin Rouge. If I want to drink, I go to a bar. If I want to listen to music, I go to a concert.

Therefore I wouldn't be high on the priority list of those promoting regular Twenty20 cricket matches. I like the game, and when it's played the way it was in the second-semi final of last year's world tournament in Durban, where India beat Australia in a match full of high-calibre cricket, it is an exhilarating form of the game. However, I'm just not sure about 40-odd successive days of Twenty20 cricket. Everything in moderation is not a bad motto.

Now that the game has become mainstream entertainment rather than just a curiosity, the administrators need to give serious consideration to the way they pitch Twenty20 cricket. They should constantly be looking for ways to ensure the game evolves rather than let it be a fad, and this involves doing something more appropriating a "mindlessly follow the USA" approach to promoting the sport.

There is a dire need to ensure they achieve the right balance between cricket skills and the entertainment factor. I once watched an American gridiron game live in Australia and came away thinking that any game that relied heavily on dancing girls was a rather shallow sport.

There are still people who like to watch cricket with a mate who understands what is going on and discuss the play between overs. They don't want to be deafened by loud music or inane chatter over the PA. If Twenty20 is going to make a serious long-term contribution to the game, a variety of fans needs to be embraced.

The other main consideration is the balance of power between the bat and the ball. Last season I asked Andrew Symonds if bats had improved during his career. "Don't worry about during my career," he said with a smile, "In the last five years they have improved dramatically."

It's hard to stop progress and nobody should be castigated for trying to improve their product, but the problem is, they can't make corresponding improvements to the ball. It's not like golf, where the fairways can be lengthened to accommodate the improvement in clubs and balls.

With Twenty20, once again bowlers are being handicapped. If it keeps raining sixes, the boundary-clearing shot will become so commonplace as to be mundane. In the first eight matches of the IPL, nearly 27% of the runs have been scored in sixes. That compares with about 4 and 7% respectively in Test and ODI cricket in the 21st century, a period of increased big hitting in the game. It's only a small sample of IPL matches but it is a trend to watch.




It may be that the shortened version of the game will evolve into a 30-overs-a-side contest, consisting of two 15-over innings for each team. While still retaining brevity, this length of game would require a tactical approach and also ensure the middle-order batsman doesn't go the way of the dodo




If, as a few players have said, the game is becoming one for power-hitters, it will lose a lot. Batting should be a mixture of skill, thought, timing and power, and the day it depends solely on the latter it will be a lot less interesting to watch. Reliance on six-hitting to keep the crowd interested is a recipe for a fad, and it will also make it difficult to judge between the good bowlers and the also-rans.

It may be that the shortened version of the game will evolve into a 30-overs-a-side contest, consisting of two 15-over innings for each team. While still retaining brevity, this length of game would require a tactical approach and also ensure the middle-order batsman doesn't go the way of the dodo and the steam train.

From the moment it was invented, Twenty20 was a game with inherent flaws because it relied so heavily on the close finish to be a thrilling spectacle. If the battle between bat and ball is a no-contest, there isn't a lot to retain the patrons' interest if, as happens so often, the result becomes a foregone conclusion early on. That is when the dancing girls become the main attraction; and pretty soon the patrons will discover those at places like the Moulin Rouge have more to offer.

And even after watching a constant stream of dancing girls at the Moulin Rouge, I came away convinced that an unbelievably skilful juggler and two classy gymnasts were the most interesting acts.

14th Match:Mumbai Indians v Deccan Chargers

Mumbai Indians v Deccan Chargers, IPL, Mumbai

Gilchrist leaves Mumbai gasping

April 27, 2008

Deccan Chargers 155 for 0 (Gilchrist 109*, Laxman 36*) beat Mumbai Indians 154 for 7 (Bravo 34, Nayar 34)
Live scorecard and ball-by-ball details
How they were out




Dwayne Bravo's 34 ensured the Mumbai Indians reached a respectable score (file photo) © DigicelCricket.com

Adam Gilchrist set the DY Patil Stadium alight with the fastest century of the tournament as the Deccan Chargers raced to their first win of the tournament. The battle between the two bottom-ranked teams was a no-contest once Gilchrist teed off, as the short boundaries and Mumbai Indians' bowlers were made a mockery of.

20 overs Mumbai Indians 154 for 7 (Bravo 34, Nayar 34) v Deccan Chargers

Playing at a new home ground and under a new captain, the Mumbai Indians would have been hoping for a change in fortunes, but it was the Deccan Chargers who came up with a spirited effort to restrict the home side to 154 for 7. Both teams had lost their first three games but VVS Laxman's decision to field first paid dividends as his bowlers kept Mumbai's top order in check throughout the first half of the match.

It was only the string of 30s from the middle order that helped Mumbai reach 154. Shaun Pollock, leading his side following the temporary suspension of stand-in captain Harbhajan Singh, made a run-a-ball 31 to revive the innings, but it was the quickfire 34s from Abhishek Nayar and Dwayne Bravo that ensured the Mumbai bowlers had a decent total to defend.

After his decision to hand Andrew Symonds the final over in the loss against Rajasthan Royals, Laxman's captaincy had come under the hammer, but on Sunday he was right on the ball. He was quick to shuffle around his bowlers, who to their credit, backed up their captain's decision with some good bowling.

Nuwan Zoysa and RP Singh started well, with the tall Zoysa extracting some steepling bounce to surprise the batsmen. Sanath Jayasuriya and Luke Ronchi had failed to make an impression in earlier games, and they were kept quiet once again, despite the short boundaries. Laxman employed a deep square-leg and no fine leg, perhaps mindful of Jayasuriya's powerful flicks, but he used the same strategy against the right-hander Ronchi, who stole two fours through the region. He steered Zoysa through cover point for a boundary, but Ronchi fell attempting to slash a tempting wide delivery angled across from RP Singh, edging straight to Laxman at slip.

Sanjay Bangar was brought on in the fourth over, perhaps to help Zoysa change ends, but the move worked. Ajinkya Rahane, making his Twenty20 debut, was done in by the lack of pace - Bangar pitched one a tad short and Rahane's pull landed safely in the hands of Pragyan Ojha at deep square leg. The next move from Laxman though was a masterstroke. Shahid Afridi was brought on in the final over of the Powerplay, and he had Robin Uthappa caught behind. It was sweet revenge for Afridi. Uthappa had greeted him by stepping out, getting down on his knee and flat-batting him straight down the ground. At the end of six overs, Mumbai were tottering at 27 for 3.

At the other end, Jayasuriya had made only 4 of his first ten deliveries, and one pitched short from Zoysa fetched him his first boundary, which came off his 14th. But, once again the introduction of Afridi in the 11th over led to a wicket, Jayasuriya got a top edge as he tried to power a googly through the leg side. The onus was then on Pollock to hold the innings together, but he too couldn't stay till the end. Taking the attack to Bangar in the 15th over, Pollock hit two trademark shots, one a four over extra cover and the other a six over long-on. Bangar kept the next ball full and straight, Pollock missed attempting another big hit, and was out bowled.

Nayar smashed three sixes in his 19-ball innings, as 45 runs came in the overs 14 to 16. But he top-edged to Gilchrist while trying to hook Zoysa. Bravo too managed to find the gaps, and was out for 34 off the last ball of the innings as Mumbai finished on 154. However, with Harbhajan missing, it's unlikely the weak Mumbai bowling line-up can stop Deccan from charging to their first win.

Teams
Mumbai Indians: 1 Sanath Jayasuriya, 2 Luke Ronchi (wk), 3 Ajinkya Rahane, 4 Robin Uthappa, 5 Dwayne Bravo, 6 Abhishek Nayar (wk), 7 Shaun Pollock (capt), 8 Siddharth Chitnis , 9 Musavir Khote, 10 Dhawal Kulkarni, 11 Ashish Nehra.

Deccan Chargers: 1 VVS Laxman (capt), 2 Adam Gilchrist (wk), 3 Shahid Afridi, 4 Andrew Symonds, 5 Rohit Sharma, 6 Arjun Yadav, 7 Sanjay Bangar, 8 Nuwan Zoysa, 9 RP Singh, 10 Pragyan Ojha, 11 D Kalyankrishna.

Twenty20 match
Indian Premier League - 14th match
Mumbai Indians v Deccan Chargers
2007/08 season

Played at Dr DY Patil Sports Academy, Mumbai, on 27 April 2008 - day/night (20-over match)

Result Deccan Chargers won by 10 wickets (with 48 balls remaining)

Mumbai Indians innings (20 overs maximum) R M B 4s 6s SR
wicketkeeper L Ronchi c Laxman b Singh 13 9 11 3 0 118.18

ST Jayasuriya c Sharma b Shahid Afridi 18 47 21 2 0 85.71

AM Rahane c Ojha b Bangar 0 7 7 0 0 0.00

RV Uthappa c wicketkeeperGilchrist b Shahid Afridi 6 8 5 1 0 120.00
captain SM Pollock b Bangar 31 36 31 3 1 100.00

AM Nayar c wicketkeeperGilchrist b Zoysa 34 33 19 1 3 178.94

DJ Bravo c Ojha b Singh 34 32 18 3 1 188.88

MA Khote not out 7 16 10 1 0 70.00

Extras (b 2, lb 4, w 3, nb 2) 11











Total (7 wickets; 20 overs; 96 mins) 154 (7.70 runs per over)

Did not bat A Nehra, DS Kulkarni, SD Chitnis

Fall of wickets1-15 (Ronchi, 2.2 ov), 2-18 (Rahane, 3.5 ov), 3-27 (Uthappa, 5.2 ov), 4-55 (Jayasuriya, 10.3 ov), 5-79 (Pollock, 13.3 ov), 6-122 (Nayar, 16.3 ov), 7-154 (Bravo, 19.6 ov)

Bowling O M R W Econ

RP Singh 4 1 15 2 3.75 (2w)

DNT Zoysa 4 0 30 1 7.50 (1nb, 1w)

SB Bangar 4 0 34 2 8.50

Shahid Afridi 4 0 32 2 8.00 (1nb)

PP Ojha 2 0 14 0 7.00

D Kalyankrishna 2 0 23 0 11.50

Deccan Chargers innings (target: 155 runs from 20 overs) R B 4s 6s SR
wicketkeeper AC Gilchrist not out 109 47 9 10 231.91
captain VVS Laxman not out 37 26 4 1 142.30

Extras (b 4, lb 1, w 4) 9











Total (0 wickets; 12 overs; 59 mins) 155 (12.91 runs per over)

Did not bat A Symonds, RG Sharma, Shahid Afridi, SB Bangar, AS Yadav, RP Singh, PP Ojha, D Kalyankrishna, DNT Zoysa

Bowling O M R W Econ

A Nehra 2 0 19 0 9.50

SM Pollock 2 0 33 0 16.50

DS Kulkarni 1 0 8 0 8.00

ST Jayasuriya 2 0 17 0 8.50

SD Chitnis 2 0 20 0 10.00 (1w)

DJ Bravo 2 0 31 0 15.50 (2w)

AM Nayar 1 0 22 0 22.00 (1w)

Toss Deccan Chargers, who chose to field first
Points Deccan Chargers 2, Mumbai Indians 0

Twenty20 debut SD Chitnis (Mumbai Indians)
Player of the match AC Gilchrist (Deccan Chargers)